
Most Network Marketing companies offer replicated web sites.
(Here is an example, yes it's my site)
There are a couple of problems with these sites.
1. They are all the same. (I know that many of them now allow you to change out some verbage and at some custom fields, but for the most part, if you've seen one, you've seen them all.)
2. Because they are all the same, Google doesn't like them or Google will latch on to one of them and that lucky person will ride the Google wave.
What if...
...along with your replicated web site, you were offered a blog?
A blog attached to your replicated web site would allow you to share your unique perspective on the company, products and people, you are involved with.
There are reasons why your company won't get on the blog bandwagen.
1. The problem with a blog is that the company will have to trust it's associates not to make products or income claims.
2. Who would manage the blogs?
Believe it or not, I have thought this through.
Someone is already monitoring the Internet for most of the larger Network Marketing companies. It would be a heck of a lot easier to watch what is said on the blogs that are being hosted by the company. Secondly, the company would be able to edit and/or delete a blog that makes claims.
The company would have greater control over the material placed on the Internet, yet they would also allow every associate the opportunity to express their thoughts and opinions.
Companies could require associates to watch a web presentation about what they can and can't write about before they get their blog and if an associate broke one of the rules, they would be out.







I read that one of the most important reasons why people join as a distributor is determined by who is giving the company presentation. I guess the same counts for websites.
People like to join up with people and not with companies. Even though it is a NM company, it is still a company.
Even though I understand in some way that a company would like to have control over weblogs about itself, I think it would be better if not. That way bogus NM companies could be more easily exposed as scams. And I thought that was what we were trying to establish ...
Posted by: tom | June 6, 2006 4:30 PM | Permalink to Comment